23 Comments

Trump's recognition of the emerging multi polar world is refreshing. This sick idea that the Atlanticists were going to rule the world and pay for it with primarily American blood and fiat currency needs to be buried once and for all. A powerful Navy to protect the shorelines and right of passage and to carry out minor punitive expeditions should be all we need. An Army and Air Force Reserves with a small active duty force which would assume command positions in a time of invasion would eliminate the standing army and the lure of adventurism that has sadly brought us so much grief and insolvency.

Enforcing the Monroe Doctrine and telling Denmark the clock is running on whether or not we will pay them for Greenland and running China out of Central America should be the only foreign policy we are going to concern ourselves with going forward.

Expand full comment

Thanks, and I totally agree!

Expand full comment

Peter Zeihan is not totally wrong. North America is certainly capable of being self sufficient in a way that few regions can ever hope to. Was the whole purpose of the Blob to weaken this country against would be hegemons? If it wasn't what would it have done differently? I agree that our Navy should be kept at strength but useful purpose does a land force sized to defeat the Warsaw Pact serve when that alliance is just a bad memory? And what purpose does a class of general officers who have never seen combat serve?

Expand full comment

Matt i enjoy your strategic view of the world commerce and example and getting back to American principles at home with secure borders

Expand full comment

Risk!

Imagine if every Risk battle was a game of Stratego; now imagine playing Stratego on multiple fronts against multiple players. Woohoo!

Ukraine is done, hopefully the 47 bio-labs were incinerated. COVID injections done! Fire the bureaucrats! The only people fooled that US AID helped others was the American payees (taxpayers). No need to worry about the intelligence “community” of conniving double crossers if they are too busy looking for their next meal!

Succeed by innovation and work ethic. South America wants to ally itself. Greenland wants to ally itself.

Expand full comment

As a long ago but frequent Risk player, we developed a strategy to defeat this. We called it Jihad but MAD would have been equally appropriate. Basically, others would be put on notice that if a border was violated, the injured party would attack until one or the other was completely destroyed. Often an uninvolved party would pick up the pieces. It produced stalemate.

Personally, I think Trump is pursuing economic advantage rather than military advantage. It's in his nature.

Expand full comment

Dude, I don't agree with a lot of what you say, but I like the way you say it. It is what I would call "muscular prose." Plus you are a sailor, so there is that.

Expand full comment

Total respect to your Loose Cannon blog.

I never miss it, and usually feel a need to put in my dos centavos.

Expand full comment

and one more thing on the annexation plans...

I have seen many people who THINK they are in the right to accuse Trump of being a "King" or a "Tyrant" in looking to expand the UNited states (Sorry I've been typing UNited for a long time)

I've even seen supposed education people use the term, "Manifest Destiny" to describe Trump's position. Too bad these people never read anything about Manifest Destiny because they would find that was an idea from the Democrats to send new immigrants over the ranges like locusts to take land without expending military forces.

The idea of expanding the US, to isolate the US from foreign entanglements, goes back to President Thomas Jefferson. See the Louisiana Purchase. Key word. "PURCHASE". Monroe expanded that theory and Jefferson backed up. It was called the Monroe Doctrine. This is what the 19th Century US Politicians turned into a right, to interfere with other nation's affairs.

The Monroe Doctrine, was created to give our nation a buffer zone to keep our new culture intact.

Wouldn't connecting Alaska with the lower 48 make sense to protect it?

ps. Go Kash!

Expand full comment

Another great grab of the brass ring on the fastest carrousel on earth. Didn't Trump make mention of our being isolated by a great ocean recently or something to that affect? Of course, those Neo-Cons of our time, call that the "isolationist position". The re-naming of the Gulf to the Gulf of America is another one. Opening the door for the Canadian people to jump into pool USA.

I think the people of BC are probably ready to make the jump. That would be a big deal. A path straight through to Alaska! We paid hugely for the canal. The guy who rode the ass of the Bush 41 administration to not follow through with turning over the canal, Richard A. Delgado, "Peril In Panama" ISBN 0-9658348-1-6 was forced into pleading guilty to child porn. Let's get that canal back. Greenland, welcome aboard as the 52nd state!

It does sound as though Trump laid the foundation for this now that Matt takes that perspective.

Like the audit on the Gold. What are they really going to do? I have thoughts on that as well.

Expand full comment

Brilliant analysis! Saving this one for the archives.

Expand full comment

Hi Matt, the right seems very excited by the re-emergence of an Orwellian superstate integration, which began with NAFTA and has been slowly advancing through the concept of a North American Union. This has long been a goal of our elites. For example, a January 2005 leaked diplomatic cable reveals U.S. government officials discussing the best approach to North American integration based on their assessment of Canadian views. The National Post's Robert Hiltz described the cable as discussing "the obstacles surrounding the merger of the economies of Canada, the United States and Mexico in a fashion similar to the European Union." We can see that such a repackaged strategy is on the agenda (including Greenland) because Google - an ultra-liberal company that fought Trump during his first term - has eagerly jumped on board. This is evident in their promotion of the ominous Gulf of America rebrand, as well as their compliance with the new anti-DEI culture shift. I am against this superstate integration as it is unnecessary, Canadians are universally weird and shitlib, and it's full of non-integrating ultra-tribal Indians.

Expand full comment

NOT "integration." Dominance by the USA of North and Central America. As much economic dominance of South America as possible.

But let the denizens of the Middle East and Eastern Europe etc battle it out by themselves.

No more voluntary military expeditions based on do-gooderism. It invariable evolves into a MIC grift engine, and the more bodies the greater the profit.

Expand full comment

Trump's, and his Sec of State Rubio, may be all for not getting involved in the world's affairs but, does he believe he can control the CIA and their covert activities? Their history, since their inception in post WWII is to be the opposite of Trump's current intentions -- to foment color revolutions around the world and to supplant worldly leaders with dupes that will do the bidding of the deep state.

Expand full comment

We'll see. I hope so.

Expand full comment

Yes, America will no long enforce its version of democracy on the world, just Israel's!

Expand full comment

I don't see Israel in my "circle of influence." Let them defend themselves, or not.

Expand full comment

For some humor:

ANNEXATIONsteria: Best Annex Greenland Memes

Mar-a-Igloo, Magadonia, our military might actually win a war with Denmark, lots of things in Trump’s shopping cart and more annex Greenland memes!

https://covidsteria.substack.com/p/annexationsteria-best-annex-greenland

Expand full comment

They want cheap labor, and to A.I. bot control everything. Automation & Depopulation. Birth rates been declining thru poor food & nutrition/porn/feminism. Question, If America cannot control & properly govern the real estate it owns now, how will it with the annexation of Panama & Greenland???🤔🤔🤔🤔

Expand full comment

Where have I said "annexation?" Dominance is not the same as annexation. Dominance because all the players want to be in a successful and economically powerful trading bloc.

Expand full comment

Annexation means basically the same thing you are talking about. I never said you said that. 👍 Matt, America has been "Invaded and taken over by drug cartels, gangs, DEI, Communist- feminist, Biker lesbians, drug addicts, hippies, Jerry Springer perved out males (paedophile gay dudes) Satanists, occultists for decades. etc You and Michael Yon are always trying to "sound the alarm" That an invasion is coming. USA has been invaded for decades. By freaks & perverted Americans

Expand full comment

Trump knows we cannot afford to continue this boondoggle in Ukraine and is willing (has been instructed) to sacrifice Europe to focus on an Israeli expansion in the ME.

Expand full comment
User was indefinitely suspended for this comment. Show
Expand full comment